f r o m v e r m e e r t o b a l t h u s
>> >> >>
Twice, I have been consciously
inspired to work with the images of other artists, these being Vermeer
and Balthus. By doing so, I do not mean merely duplicating the work
of another; the intent is not to replicate the style of another
artist, not to attempt to master the technical virtuosity of another,
as was a common practice during the seventeenth to early nineteenth
centuries among students of European art academies. Rather, as with
any object of inspiration, the impetus to explore the work of another
is a process of reaction and assimilation, the result of which a
fresh interpretation is born. Each artist utilizes the visual language
of form, colour, line, composition, texture, negative and positive
space, concept, etc., however, what we each make of these visual
components, how we use them, creates a "mark" not unlike
a fingerprint. Whatever it is that inspires us, does so because
it strikes a cardinal chord and, thus, compels a response. In both
Vermeer and Balthus I found a compatible visual language and through
investigating its similarities discovered dissimilarities and, throughout,
my own singular expression in response. Inspiration comes in many
ways - reacting to it is the journey.
VERMEER: THE MAURITSHUIS GIRL SERIES
| |
|
|
| fig. 1
Vermeer's Girl with Pearl Earring |
|
fig. 2
The Tunnel |
Vermeer's Girl with Pearl Earring (fig. 1)
is a work I first encountered as a child - it appeared as a small
reproduction in the "A" volume of an encyclopedia. A was
for "art," among other things, and this volume provided
a whirlwind introduction to the world of painting, a miniaturized
gallery of Michelangelos, Picassos, Warhols, etc., wherein centuries
of art-making were reduced to a mere ten or so pages. Vermeer's
Girl with Pearl Earring enthralled me even then and I recall a lazy
summer afternoon, with pencil and a page torn from someone's notepad,
captivated by the act of recreating her haunting gaze. I was not
alone in my mesmerization; Vermeer's girl is one of the most popular
of his works, her image so often reproduced that one grows nearly
blind to it. Like the enigmatic smile of Mona Lisa - seen too often,
one is immunized against its impact.
Then, in January of 2000 I found myself face to face with her, "the
girl." An hour or so from Amsterdam (where I was spending the
winter), the Mauritshuis Museum in Den Hague was hosting an exhibition
entitled Rembrant by Himself, an inaugural gathering of Rembrant's
self-portraits, not something to be missed. The Mauritshuis is an
intimate space, crowded with small rooms and large paintings and
that day, at least, too many visitors to view anything too clearly.
To escape the shoulder to shoulder claustrophobia, I rounded a corner
into a room nearly empty of people, save for those whose images
were stretched on canvas and hanging quietly on walls. And there
she was, The Girl with Pearl Earring... as fresh and alive and as
contemporary as she must have been when posing for Vermeer almost
three and a half centuries before. She took my breath.
And she played on my mind. Melodramatic as this may seem, the only
way of exorcizing her grasp was to indulge my need to further explore
her image. What was it about that pose, that expression, that momentary
glance that rendered the subject of this painting both alive and
timeless? Of course, there was Vermeer's treatment of the subject,
the application of the paint which, upon close examination, is astonishingly
loose - little dabs of white at the corners of the girl's mouth,
the brush strokes defining the fabric of the headdress - executed
without the concentrated and self-conscious pain of deliberation.
His geometric analysis of the face, a study of form in planes of
light and shadow - all this, altogether, contributed to the
integrity of the subject and its intrigue. My intent in exploring
Vermeer's subject centred on discovering the kernel of its credibility,
to succumb to it as with any object of inspiration - not for
the need of result, but for the need of doing. Thus began several
works which I call The Mauritshuis Girl series, of which The Tunnel
(fig 2) is one.
The Mauritshuis Girl series is composed (to date) of six paintings,
with a seventh in progress. The first of this series, In the Woods,
depicts "the girl", much as Vermeer painted her, wearing
the peculiar, yet, timeless headdress but placed within an established
context - in this case, the indication of a forest. Painting
# 2, entitled The Gathering, depicts "the girl - as one
of several people in a crowd. The paintings which followed: The
Umbrella, The Sea, Clouds, and The Tunnel, utilize only the pose,
while the women depicted vary otherwise, quite dramatically, in
appearance.
The Mauritshuis Girl may continue to evolve, cropping up from time
to time in works as, what has now become, part of my personal iconography.
And so, what began as my involvement with Vermeer's Girl With Pearl
Earring, has become my Mauritshuis Girl, an exploration of a psychological
state as expressed in the turning of a head, of momentary eye contact,
of the ambiguity of fleeting encounters, of a single, almost insignificant
moment trapped.
PLAYING WITH BALTHUS:
| |
|
|
| fig. 3 The Dream |
|
fig. 4 (detail) Balthus'
"The Room" |
Balthus (Count Bathazar Klossowski de Rola),
a figurative painter of Polish decent and French nationality, embarked
upon his career in the late 1920's, holding his first solo-exhibition
in Paris in 1934. The images he produced over the following four
decades are haunting and enigmatic depictions of friends (Joan Miro,
Andre Derain, Matisse, etc.), street scenes, landscapes and interiors
wherein the human form - most often female - plays an integral role.
Certain works - interiors in which young women or girls were the
subjec t- struck a primary chord with me. As a figurative painter
who also paints female subjects, these Balthus figures compelled
me to recreate them. Thus, focusing on details of his compositions
- extracting a single figure, altering its context, or combining
figures - I played with Balthus. What occurred during this exploration
of Balthus was not anticipated. I found myself struggling with the
vulnerability of his female figures, needing to transform them,
sometimes clothe them, contrary to my reason and sense of aestheticism.
For example, the figure in my "The Dream" (fig. 3) is
based on Balthus' "The Room" (fig. 4) in which the figure
is right unclothed. The light falls perfectly
and unbroken along the length of the body...but reveals a young
and vulnerable body. Those who are familiar with my work will know
I have painted women in blatantly sexual poses - legs spread and
crotches exposed - yet, in recreating certain poses of Balthus I
found myself reticent, uncertain and realizing I could not have
posed the female figure as he did. My female figures, spread-eagled
though they may at times be, maintain their autonomy whether it
be through a sexual power or what seems an unconscious disregard
for their audience. While originally drawn to the beauty and purity
of Balthus' forms, this exercise proved that a mutual aestheticism
does not ensure a mutual perspective. Indeed, in exploring the perspectives
of others - be these born of era, of gender, of politics or race
- one finds one's own. |
|